Ever tried that Maffetone 180-age formula to calculate your max aerobic training heart rate, only to think, “Uh, this feels a little too… slow?” If so, you’re not alone—especially if you’re an older runner. Let’s talk about a tweak that might just be your answer.
Introducing: IMAT (Individual Maximum Aerobic Training Heart Rate)
IMAT is a more personalized way to figure out your max aerobic training heart rate, and it’s based on your actual max heart rate rather than a general formula. So if the Maffetone MAF Test and MAF heart rate zones approach has been leaving you feeling like you’re sandbagging it, IMAT might be a better fit.
Here’s the lowdown:
This was derived from Mike Trees (@run.nrg), our podcast co-host and coaching partner.
IMAT = Max Heart Rate – 40
Yep, it’s that simple. Your max heart rate (Max HR), minus 40. This formula comes from Mike Trees (@Run.nrg on Instagram) as an alternative for those who feel a little constrained by the Maffetone 180-age method.
Here’s an example to bring it to life:
For someone like Mike, at age 58, the Maffetone 180-age formula gives a target aerobic HR of 123 bpm. That’s based on a max HR of 163 (using the traditional 220-age formula). But here’s the catch: Mike’s real max HR is actually 173 bpm, not 163.
So, using IMAT, his max aerobic training heart rate becomes:
173 – 40 = 133 bpm
That’s a whole 10 beats higher than Maffetone’s formula—and it actually feels right for him.
This isn’t a total departure from the Maffetone approach. It’s just a tweak that makes it a bit more… you. If you know your true max HR, IMAT offers a better fit, respecting the Maff principles while dialing things in to your actual physiology.
Before you dive into finding your max heart rate, a quick heads-up: this test is no joke. Getting an accurate max HR reading is intense—borderline brutal. You’re pushing yourself to your limit here, and that’s not something to take lightly. So, let’s go over who shouldn’t be jumping into this just yet.
To tackle this test safely and accurately, here’s what you need:
The bottom line? Don’t rush into this unless you’re fully prepared. It’s an intense test, and for it to be safe and effective, you need the right mix of fitness, freshness, and mental readiness.
If you’re ready to go beyond the “220 minus age” calculation, here are two DIY methods for finding your true max HR out in the wild:
Neither of these is perfect, but they’re more reliable than “220 minus age.” For true accuracy, of course, a lab test is the gold standard. But if you’re like most of us who don’t have that kind of access, these two methods should get you close.
If you’re curious about IMAT and this resonates with you, give it a try! Play around with the formula and see how it feels in your training. Just remember: endurance training isn’t a one-size-fits-all thing. This approach respects the foundations of aerobic training while adjusting to your body.
Oh, and if you find this helpful, spread the word to your running crew—sometimes, small tweaks like these can be a game-changer.
Running Nutrition Isn’t Hard. It’s Misunderstood. (Nutrition Masterclass)
Your Foam Roller Isn’t Working. Use It Anyway.
If You Can’t Do This Speed Workout, You’re Not as Fit as You Think
The Dangerous Level of Strava Runners No One Talks About
You’re Doing 10K Training Wrong, And It’s Keeping You Stuck