I’m lazy. Not the “do-nothing” lazy but the smart lazy. The kind of lazy that makes you think, How can I get great results while putting in the least amount of effort upfront? You know, in theory, it’s not really possible, but if you can find the right mental shortcuts—systems or frameworks that work across multiple areas of your life—you can essentially “flick a switch” and get incredible results with less effort on the back end. That’s where this billionaire entrepreneur’s approach was a huge mind unlock. I named him six years ago on this post, but I won’t name him now due to his polarizing political nature and general hate — This is a running newsletter, not. political soap box 😂.
But let’s try to separate the “art from the artist” for a second.
Years ago, I came across his mental model, which he calls the “First Principles Algorithm.” It’s part problem-solving framework, part life hack, and 100% applicable to runners. I’ve used it daily ever since as part of my 1% Better Everyday ethos. What struck me most? It gives you permission to mess up. To push too hard, get injured, or overdo it. Because testing your limits is part of the process, even one of the biggest companies in the world, which this billionaire runs, has to fail and adapt constantly. Painful? Sure. But less so when you expect failure as a stepping stone instead of thinking you’ll nail it the first time.
First principles thinking and his specific algorithm isn’t about magical shortcuts. It’s about breaking things down to the core—facts, data, what you know—and building up from there, free from assumptions or analogies.
Example of first principles thinking: Looking at the data, I know that improving my half marathon time by just 1 minute per year is achievable through consistent training. Starting from my current time of 1:31, I can reach my goal of 1:20 within 11 years through minor, measurable improvements.
Example of analogous thinking: Since none of my running friends have achieved a 1:20 half marathon, and it seems like such a big jump from my current time, I assume it must be impossible for me, too. This limiting belief ignores the scientific evidence that gradual improvement is possible.
A mostly simple but very advanced five-step approach to problem-solving and systems/process improvement. It emphasizes what is required to do something, avoiding unnecessary elements and optimizing what is left.
I did this backward in the past. I added too much mileage too quickly, thinking I’d scale up fast and crush my next race. I got injured, obviously. But that failure taught me where my limits were and how to work within them. The algorithm let me test those boundaries without beating myself up when I got it wrong.
For me, it showed up in my running. I wanted the results—faster times, longer distances—but without wasting time on things that didn’t move the needle. When I applied the algorithm, I stopped obsessing over fancy gear and endless advice and just ran consistently. And guess what? It worked.
The method encourages overcorrection in deletion to ensure true simplification, followed by speeding up and automating the process. This approach challenges conventional thinking and aims to create the most efficient and effective solutions possible.
I created a whole new algorithm for runners. Let me know when you run your best time – You’re welcome in advance!
Running Nutrition Isn’t Hard. It’s Misunderstood. (Nutrition Masterclass)
Your Foam Roller Isn’t Working. Use It Anyway.
If You Can’t Do This Speed Workout, You’re Not as Fit as You Think
The Dangerous Level of Strava Runners No One Talks About
You’re Doing 10K Training Wrong, And It’s Keeping You Stuck